How to Boost Your GRE Sentence Equivalence Score
GRE Sentence Equivalence asks for two words that each create a synonymous sentence, which is not the same as picking two synonymous words from the option list. The reliable process...
GRE Sentence Equivalence asks for two words that each create a synonymous sentence, which is not the same as picking two synonymous words from the option list. The reliable process is to form your own answer before looking at the options, simplify the sentence, eliminate options that do not fit, then run a final check that the two survivors actually produce sentences with the same meaning. The most common way to fail this question type is trusting a word list instead of learning how a word’s meaning shifts with context.
Sentence Equivalence questions ask you to pick two right answers instead of one, which makes them feel more confusing than they need to be. The good news is that the confusion has a fixed shape, and once you see the shape, the questions get a lot more mechanical.
Sentence Equivalence vs. Text Completion in GRE Verbal
There is no question type officially called “sentence completion” on the GRE, and clearing that up matters.
ETS, which owns and administers the GRE, recognises exactly three Verbal Reasoning question types:
- Sentence Equivalence
- Text Completion
- Reading Comprehension
Any fill in the blank question tends to get called “sentence completion” informally, which is why Text Completion and Sentence Equivalence both end up mislabelled that way. In any case, when you see one sentence with one blank and six options to pick from, your instinct will be to look for the option that completes the sentence. That instinct only gets you part of the way to the right answer on Sentence Equivalence.
You will sometimes see “Critical Reasoning” listed as a fourth GRE Verbal category. It is not an official ETS category. At most, it describes a small subset of argument based Reading Comprehension questions, not a separate question type with its own format.
A typical Sentence Equivalence question consists of one sentence with one blank. It offers six answer options, and your objective is to choose two, both of which give the sentence a similar meaning. Things get complicated when more than two options look like they could be viable answers, which is exactly what happens most of the time. That is when you need a reliable process rather than intuition.
Crackverbal’s guide on learning GRE words with context explains why word lists alone won’t get you through Sentence Equivalence.
Synonymous Words vs. synonymous sentences
This is the one idea that unlocks the entire question type.
You can expect more than two of the six options to sound like they complete the sentence in a way that makes sense. That is by design, and it is exactly what leads most people to the wrong pair. The objective in Sentence Equivalence is not to pick two synonymous words from the given options. It is to pick two words that each create a synonymous sentence.
| Definition | |
|---|---|
| Synonyms | Two or more words with the same or similar meaning. They may carry different connotations but are still synonyms if they can be interpreted to mean the same thing. |
| Synonymous sentences | Two complete sentences, not just words, that convey a similar meaning, regardless of how they are worded. |
A Sentence Equivalence question gives you one sentence with one keyword removed. You complete it in two separate ways, one word at a time, so that the two resulting sentences say roughly the same thing. Sometimes the correct pair are synonyms of each other. Often they are not, and the only thing that matters is whether the two completed sentences carry the same meaning within that specific context.
Five Tactics to Solve Sentence Equivalence
Worked through end to end on one real GRE style question.
It is tempting to skip this step because it feels unnecessary. That is a trap. Read the question carefully and try to come up with your own answer before looking at the options. Covering the answer choices with your hand while you do this helps, since it stops you from anchoring on whatever sounds plausible.
If you can come up with your own answer, a word that gives complete meaning to the sentence, it means you have understood exactly what needs to go into that blank. It makes it far easier to reverse engineer the actual options afterward.
Here, the word “pretentiousness” fits well. It captures the disdain the artist feels for such extravagant praise, and it is a noun. It is not one of the six options given, which confirms you have understood the question correctly rather than accidentally matched an answer.
Sentence Equivalence questions vary in difficulty, and the tougher ones tend to have more complex sentence structure, which is what confuses people. You will not have the luxury of taking your time on the real test, so cut the unnecessary information out of the sentence.
Strip flamboyant but unnecessary description first, then excess adjectives:
Then remove anything that adds inconsequential information rather than the value the sentence needs:
By now the structure is simple enough to consider the answer options without confusion. If big or unusual words are intimidating, feel free to swap in simpler synonyms and loosen the sentence structure a little, as long as the meaning holds:
With a clear, simplified sentence in hand, check it against the original question to make sure you have not lost anything important. Once you are confident nothing essential is missing, start considering the options.
Mentally insert each option, one at a time, and see which ones actually fit. Eliminate the ones that do not make sense.
Options: 1. Cynicism 2. Exaggeration 3. Skepticism 4. Antipathy 5. Zealotry 6. Hyperbole
The word “such” refers to the act of making high flown comparisons and invocations of art history. The word that follows should be a noun a person would use to describe that act if they found it repulsive.
“Cynicism” means an inclination to believe people act only from selfish motives, or to disbelieve appearances. That does not fit an act of giving high praise, so cynicism is out. “Skepticism” carries a similar meaning and is equally unfit.
“Exaggeration” means presenting something as much better or worse than it is. The sentence describes high flown comparisons and invocations of art history, and the artist may see that as overstated, so this is a good fit. “Hyperbole” also means overstating, which makes it a good fit too.
That leaves “antipathy” and “zealotry.” Antipathy means a lack of feeling, and nothing in the sentence implies the artist lacks feeling about the praise, so it is ruled out. Zealotry means fanaticism or extremism, and it is plausible the artist would see overemphasized praise as overzealous, and the word carries the right negative connotation.
Three options are now eliminated, leaving exaggeration, zealotry, and hyperbole. Do not settle yet. There is one more check before you can be sure.
The final check is to see whether the remaining options actually create synonymous sentences. Remember, the options themselves do not need to be synonyms of each other. What matters is whether they convey a similar meaning within this specific context.
Insert each of the three remaining options and compare the resulting sentences:
- “…he finds such exaggeration repulsive…”
- “…he finds such zealotry repulsive…”
- “…he finds such hyperbole repulsive…”
Inserting “zealotry” conveys a stronger sense of dislike and hints at possible hostility toward the act of giving superlative praise. “Exaggeration” and “hyperbole” both convey a general dislike and disapproval of the same act, without that added hostility.
The obvious synonymity between “exaggeration” and “hyperbole” is worth noting on its own, but always run the check rather than stopping at the obvious pair. The answer is exaggeration and hyperbole.
Crackverbal teaches students a single mnemonic to remember all four steps: RISE, standing for Read, Identify, Synthesize, and Eliminate.
Read: understand what the sentence says before doing anything else. Misreading or skipping even one word can derail the entire process.
Identify keywords: whether the sentence is simple or complex, certain words define its entire meaning. These are the keywords that make up the skeleton of the sentence.
Synthesize your own answer: cover the options and come up with your own word before looking at what is offered. You only need one word, not two, at this stage.
Eliminate: armed with a clear understanding of the sentence, its keywords, and your own answer, work through the options one by one. Discard the ones that do not fit, then find the two that create synonymous sentences.
Practising with real GRE questions is what turns RISE into an instinct instead of a checklist.
Why Word Lists Fail You on This Question Type
A word’s meaning only exists in context, and Sentence Equivalence is built entirely around that fact.
The intended meaning of any given word is only revealed by the context it appears in. Outside of that context, the word may mean something entirely different. Take the word “fine” across three sentences:
| Sentence | Synonyms for “fine” here |
|---|---|
| Gillian is a woman of fine taste. | Exceptional, outstanding, distinguished |
| The management thought it would be fine to keep the matter quiet. | Acceptable, okay, alright |
| The group is expected to pay a fine for the transgression. | Penalty, fee, charge |
Out of context, “fine” could mean any of these things. It is not enough to simply pick a pair of synonyms from the six available options, because the context may fit one word but not the other. If you rely on word lists to learn GRE vocabulary, this question type will be especially difficult, since word lists teach definitions but not context, and knowing a word’s meaning without knowing its nuanced, contextual use makes it nearly impossible to get this section right.
The best way to avoid Sentence Equivalence pitfalls is to make sure you learn GRE vocabulary with context, not from isolated word lists.
Frequently Asked Questions
Crackverbal has guided 30,000+ students through GRE prep. Get a personalised study plan for your target score.
Talk to a GRE ExpertA Process, Not a Guess. That’s the Whole Shift.
If you have made it to the end of this guide, you now know everything you need to approach GRE Sentence Equivalence with a process instead of a guess. All that is left is to practise with real questions until RISE stops feeling like a checklist and starts feeling automatic.
Diagnostic test and personalised study plan from Crackverbal’s GRE experts.
Nitha Jayachandran is the Verbal Head at Crackverbal, where she leads GMAT and GRE verbal training. A Cambridge CELTA-certified educator with over a decade of teaching experience, she has a background that cuts across test prep, copywriting, and brand strategy — which means she thinks about language the way most people think about arguments: carefully, and with some suspicion of the obvious. When she is not pulling apart a Critical Reasoning question, she is likely pulling apart a recipe, analysing a novel, or planning her next trip. Years spent in copywriting gave her a storyteller's instinct, and she brings that to her teaching — which turns out to be a considerable advantage for anyone trying to make sense of a dense RC passage or a word that refuses to stick.
TL;DR: English has approximately 200 Greek and Latin roots that generate a large share of GRE high-frequency vocabulary. Learning a...
Your GRE 320+ journey starts
with clarity.
Diagnostic test and personalised study plan.